Are verbs suitable as response options (Brexit)?

2023-12-01 by LS

The answer can be found in our article: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02422-2

Categories: Allgemein | Tags: Ballot, Brexit, Brexitdebate, Brexitpolling, Brexitvote, Britishpolitics, conceptbias, DecisionMaking, Elections, EU, EUexit, EUexternalrelations, EUforeignrelations, EUpolitics, EuropeanCommission, EuropeanUnion, EvidenceBased, InternationalRelations, PolicyMaking, PoliticalParticipation, politicalvoting, publicopinion, Referendum, referendumchoices, referendumoutcomes, ReferendumResults, ResearchforDecisionMaking, ScienceandPolitics, ScienceandSociety, ScienceCommunication, ScienceDiplomacy, ScienceforDiplomacy, SciencePolicy, ScientificAdvice, stayorleave, UKpolitics, verbalresponseoptions, Vote, Voting, votingtrends | Permalink

Comments are closed.

← Previous Post

Ströbel, L.; Koch, I.; Salge, T.-O. & Antons, D. (2023l). To stay, remain or leave: How verbal concepts as response options in political referendums such as the Brexit polls might bias voting outcomes .(1-11)

Ströbel, L. (2023e). Framing effects in the Media coverage of the migration crisis -The changing implicit demands on the EU in face of the migrant crisis – a comparison of adjective and verb clusters in the French press coverage (2015 vs. 2018). (95-119)

Ströbel, L. (2023d). Auf der Suche nach kollektiver Identität – Der Begriff “Nation” im Spannungsfeld europäischer Renaissance und einzelstaatlicher Exitbestrebungen. (265-286)

Ströbel, L. (2019a). Le jaune de la discorde – Emmanuel Macron et les mouvements identitaires face à la crise des Gilets Jaunes. (87-106)

Ströbel, L. (2018a). Sensomotorische Konzepte – Simulationsstrategien im französischen Wahlkampf. (249-268)

Ströbel, L. (2020c). Les « verbes haptiques » dans les discours politiques actuels – une approche dans le cadre de la cognition incorporée et de l’énaction. (117-140)

Ströbel, L. (2019b). The use of sensorimotor-based concepts during and after presidential campaigns: Emmanuel Macron and Donald Trump. (131-150)

Ströbel, L. (2018b). Can Macromania be explained linguistically? Beneath the morphological boundary: A sketch of subconscious manipulation strategies in Emmanuel Macron’s political discourses. (65-84)

Ströbel, L. (2017c). How submorphological relics of perceptual parameters still influence synchronic use and may have had an impact on recent presidential elections. (151-169)

Ströbel, L. (2021a). Wege aus der Manipulationsspirale. Methoden der Fake News-Aufdeckung im Umfeld der Covid 19-Impfung. (99-107)

Gamerschlag, T., Petersen, W. & L. Ströbel (2013a). Sitting, Standing, and Lying in Frames: a frame-based approach to stative posture verbs. (73-93)

Ströbel, L. (2011a). Invisible, visible, grammaticalization. (211-234)

Ströbel, L. (2014b). Sensomotorische Strategien & Sprachwandel. (139-154)

Ströbel, L. (2015a). Linguistic Realizations of the Concept of FEAR. (219-236)

Ströbel, L. (2014c). Grenzen und Spielräume der Wahrnehmung – eine typologische Analyse von Bewegungs-, Kontakt- und Lokationsverben. (169-186).

Ströbel, L. (2014d). Todo crimen es un acto de posesión: Buñuel y sus heroínas.(53-67)

Ströbel, L. (2016d). L’influence du concept de source – une analyse contrastive des extensions et des restrictions sémantiques du verbe « monter ». (343-370)

González-Márquez, M., Feist, M. & Ströbel, L. (2017d). Converging on a theory of language through multiple methods.

Ströbel, L. (2017b). The linguistic influence of perceptual and conceptual parameters. (169 – 186)

Ströbel, L. (2014a). Sprache & Gedanken – Mit Sherlock Holmes auf Spurensuche.(59-72)

Ballero Flores, V. & Ströbel, L. (2019c). Theoretische Überlegungen zur Visuellen Grammatik. (163-185)

Ströbel, L. (2020b). Sprache, Rede & Kognition – am Beispiel von verbos leves im Portugiesischen. (255-277)